Print

Response from Sir Robert Syms MP

Received 28th October 2021 and reproduced in full without amendment

Dear Phil,      There has been much misunderstanding and controversy concerning the Environment Bill as it passes through Parliament.  To be clear: the Bill strengthens controls on sewage outfalls – not weakens it.  But had the amendment stopping all sewage outfalls been passed, it would have resulted in the dangerous discharge of sewage into our streets at times of high rainfall and would have landed customers with unsustainably high water bills.  The amendment proposed by a back bench hereditary Peer had just not been thought through.  The Government has now agreed a form of words that meets the objective that the Amendment was seeking but it worded in a more workable form.  I should stress that the legislative process of a complex Bill does mean the MPs vote on numerous occasions, not for or against sewage, but to find a form of words that make the Bill workable and successful in the objective of cleaning up our rivers and seashore.

The Environment Bill now imposes

In addition, between 2020 and 2025, water companies will invest £7.1bn on environmental improvements in England. Of this, £3.1 billion specifically will be invested in storm overflow improvements.

The age of our Victorian sewerage systems means that the complete elimination of discharges from storm overflows would be extremely difficult. This process would involve the complete separation of sewerage systems, leading to potentially significant disruption for homes, businesses and infrastructure across the country. Initial assessments suggest total elimination would cost anywhere from £150 billion to £600 billion. With such amounts, huge customer bill increases and trade-offs against other water industry priorities would be unavoidable.

Governments – as opposed to opposition parties – do need to take all these factors into account.

However, addressing storm overflows is only one part of the picture when it comes to improving water quality. The Environment Bill requires the Government to set and achieve at least one new target to drive progress when it comes to water. In the policy paper published in August 2020, the Government set out the objectives for targets currently under consideration. For water, these include reducing pollution from agriculture, wastewater, and abandoned metal mines, and reducing water demand.

Funding for the Catchment Sensitive Farming programme has almost doubled with an additional £17m over the next three years. The new annual budget will be £30m, up from £16.6m in 2020 / 21. This includes allocating £1.2 million to the Environment Agency to significantly increase the number of inspectors visiting farmers to reduce diffuse water pollution, with 50 additional full-time employees recruited for inspections. Taking a catchment wide approach to water management is vital in our more holistic approach to water management.

Over 3,000 hectares of new woodlands are set to be planted along England’s rivers and watercourses. Planting trees on and around riverbanks, or allowing them to grow naturally, can help to improve water quality by reducing the runoff of pollutants into rivers.

The Environment Bill is landmark legislation that will clean up our rivers and seashore and make a massive environmental difference to my constituents in Poole and I am proud of my Government’s record in pursuing these objectives.

Sir Robert Syms MP

Member of Parliament for Poole